I must say, as a non-teacher, this text was brutal to read at the start. But, once it started discussing the different approaches to teaching Rhetoric & Composition, it started to catch my attention as I started recounting some of my worst and best memories as an English student.
As I’ve mentioned plenty of times before, the reason I switched universities was mainly because the curriculum at MSU was getting extremely redundant & mundane and I started to feel like Coraline”s father:

I was tired of reading the same white old men over and over again. We were going through at least 10 novels in one class, which didn’t allow me to digest much anyway. We did discuss important issues as well, but it was always in the context of the 18th to 19th century. I want to learn about my present. So the routine became: read novel, discuss in class, write paper, read novel, discuss in class, write paper, read novel, etc. It gets old quickly.
What really disheartened me was that when I decided to continue my graduate studies in English there, I did not have any opportunity to explore the creative writing aspect. It was all academic and I felt like I was just fulfilling that 5-paragraph essay quota I used to in high school. Thankfully, I survived & saved myself by going through with the decision to switch.
I will say that not every professor was this way, but those that were overshadowed the good ones. Something that Lauer also brings up is the act of revision of student’s work. I can only imagine how tiring it is to be reading countless papers on the same topic, but if I’m writing a 10-page research paper and I receive a disappointing grade on it with ONE revision comment…..how am I supposed to understand where I’m lacking? Of course, I can go to ask for more in-depth feedback & I did. But, it would end in the professor telling me what to write, rather than giving me options on how to improve.
Again, there were good apples too. The professors that thrive on that spontaneous kind of teaching that keeps me alert in a 3 hr class, but it was typically the creative writing professors. Why can’t that teaching be applied to the heavy literature studies classes? In the end, I’m grateful for my time there but even more so that I recognized what was wrong and did something about it.





